<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Venture Capital for the Long Tail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/</link>
	<description>Translating Business Strategies into Financial Models</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:35:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Actually, venture capital *is* adapting. &#124; Taylor Davidson (@tdavidson)</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-2787</link>
		<dc:creator>Actually, venture capital *is* adapting. &#124; Taylor Davidson (@tdavidson)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-2787</guid>
		<description>[...] to a train of thought around potential funding models for startups, returning to an old post about venture capital: Venture capital, for one, has yet to deliver a scalable, viable funding and economic model to fit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a train of thought around potential funding models for startups, returning to an old post about venture capital: Venture capital, for one, has yet to deliver a scalable, viable funding and economic model to fit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Invest in the venture system, not venture capitalists. &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>Invest in the venture system, not venture capitalists. &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>[...] you&#8217;ve read some of my past posts, none of this should be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you&#8217;ve read some of my past posts, none of this should be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resource Management Software</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>Resource Management Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>Very good points there, especially about how project management software is becoming more accessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good points there, especially about how project management software is becoming more accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markets in Everything: Innovation in Angel Investing &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>Markets in Everything: Innovation in Angel Investing &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>[...] the traditional venture capital model is ill-suited for many technology, web-based startups. But it&#8217;s not just about changing technology: it&#8217;s a cultural change, a generational change, a shift in how economic value can be created, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the traditional venture capital model is ill-suited for many technology, web-based startups. But it&#8217;s not just about changing technology: it&#8217;s a cultural change, a generational change, a shift in how economic value can be created, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Considering the future of the music industry: Jeff Price of TuneCore and Ethan Bauley &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Considering the future of the music industry: Jeff Price of TuneCore and Ethan Bauley &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>[...] decreasing faster than we can take advantage of them; are we ready economically and culturally for entrepreneurship on a vastly different scale? Do we have the legal, cultural and business ecosystem to leverage the value creation and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decreasing faster than we can take advantage of them; are we ready economically and culturally for entrepreneurship on a vastly different scale? Do we have the legal, cultural and business ecosystem to leverage the value creation and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Millenials are shaping the workforce &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Millenials are shaping the workforce &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>[...] Will the Millenial generation just drop out of Boomer corporate culture and employ themselves by creating their own companies and workplace cultures? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will the Millenial generation just drop out of Boomer corporate culture and employ themselves by creating their own companies and workplace cultures? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Traditional VC is not tenable in lifestyle businesses: the model does not fit.  The opportunity is to change the model, and it&#039;s not what we are calling VC today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I simply believe we (society, business) need to create ways to support entrepreneurship, and for many people lifestyle (even &quot;service&quot;) businesses is their route.  If you carry out entrepreneurship to the masses, there simply won&#039;t be enough ground-breaking product businesses to sustainably support that amount of people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But now you&#039;re thinking of the model...  one of the key problems with &lt;a href=&quot;http://prosper.com&quot;&gt;prosper.com&lt;/a&gt; has been securities law and investing in &quot;individuals&quot; by individuals.  A marketplace in the middle, funding &quot;companies&quot; (lightweight companies) solves that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional VC is not tenable in lifestyle businesses: the model does not fit.  The opportunity is to change the model, and it&#39;s not what we are calling VC today.</p>
<p>I simply believe we (society, business) need to create ways to support entrepreneurship, and for many people lifestyle (even &#8220;service&#8221;) businesses is their route.  If you carry out entrepreneurship to the masses, there simply won&#39;t be enough ground-breaking product businesses to sustainably support that amount of people.</p>
<p>But now you&#39;re thinking of the model&#8230;  one of the key problems with <a href="http://prosper.com">prosper.com</a> has been securities law and investing in &#8220;individuals&#8221; by individuals.  A marketplace in the middle, funding &#8220;companies&#8221; (lightweight companies) solves that problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Traditional VC is not tenable in lifestyle businesses: the model does not fit.  The opportunity is to change the model, and it&#039;s not what we are calling VC today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I simply believe we (society, business) need to create ways to support entrepreneurship, and for many people lifestyle (even &quot;service&quot;) businesses is their route.  If you carry out entrepreneurship to the masses, there simply won&#039;t be enough ground-breaking product businesses to sustainably support that amount of people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But now you&#039;re thinking of the model...  one of the key problems with &lt;a href=&quot;http://prosper.com&quot;&gt;prosper.com&lt;/a&gt; has been securities law and investing in &quot;individuals&quot; by individuals.  A marketplace in the middle, funding &quot;companies&quot; (lightweight companies) solves that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional VC is not tenable in lifestyle businesses: the model does not fit.  The opportunity is to change the model, and it&#39;s not what we are calling VC today.</p>
<p>I simply believe we (society, business) need to create ways to support entrepreneurship, and for many people lifestyle (even &#8220;service&#8221;) businesses is their route.  If you carry out entrepreneurship to the masses, there simply won&#39;t be enough ground-breaking product businesses to sustainably support that amount of people.</p>
<p>But now you&#39;re thinking of the model&#8230;  one of the key problems with <a href="http://prosper.com">prosper.com</a> has been securities law and investing in &#8220;individuals&#8221; by individuals.  A marketplace in the middle, funding &#8220;companies&#8221; (lightweight companies) solves that problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFischer</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that &quot;traditional&quot; VC -- that is, an agent acting on behalf of a large pool of investments -- is tenable in the market of lifestyle business.  The problem with the lifestyle microfinancing stuff is that in reasonable investment lifespans, it&#039;s effectively a high-risk, low-reward prospect.  Putting $50k into a project now whose income might only hit $100k/year isn&#039;t a very good investment for a VC -- on the other hand, it&#039;s a great investment for a person to make, doubly so if it enables them to quit their day job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, a VC-backed &lt;a href=&quot;http://prosper.com&quot;&gt;prosper.com&lt;/a&gt; equivalent might be an interesting approach, particularly if it integrated with SourceForge or WorkingWithRails to programmatically grok &quot;geek cred&quot;...  Hrm...now I&#039;ve got a start-up idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure that &#8220;traditional&#8221; VC &#8212; that is, an agent acting on behalf of a large pool of investments &#8212; is tenable in the market of lifestyle business.  The problem with the lifestyle microfinancing stuff is that in reasonable investment lifespans, it&#39;s effectively a high-risk, low-reward prospect.  Putting $50k into a project now whose income might only hit $100k/year isn&#39;t a very good investment for a VC &#8212; on the other hand, it&#39;s a great investment for a person to make, doubly so if it enables them to quit their day job.</p>
<p>On the other hand, a VC-backed <a href="http://prosper.com">prosper.com</a> equivalent might be an interesting approach, particularly if it integrated with SourceForge or WorkingWithRails to programmatically grok &#8220;geek cred&#8221;&#8230;  Hrm&#8230;now I&#39;ve got a start-up idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFischer</title>
		<link>http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/2008/07/21/venture-capital-for-the-long-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unstructuredventures.com/uv/?p=30#comment-733</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that &quot;traditional&quot; VC -- that is, an agent acting on behalf of a large pool of investments -- is tenable in the market of lifestyle business.  The problem with the lifestyle microfinancing stuff is that in reasonable investment lifespans, it&#039;s effectively a high-risk, low-reward prospect.  Putting $50k into a project now whose income might only hit $100k/year isn&#039;t a very good investment for a VC -- on the other hand, it&#039;s a great investment for a person to make, doubly so if it enables them to quit their day job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, a VC-backed &lt;a href=&quot;http://prosper.com&quot;&gt;prosper.com&lt;/a&gt; equivalent might be an interesting approach, particularly if it integrated with SourceForge or WorkingWithRails to programmatically grok &quot;geek cred&quot;...  Hrm...now I&#039;ve got a start-up idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure that &#8220;traditional&#8221; VC &#8212; that is, an agent acting on behalf of a large pool of investments &#8212; is tenable in the market of lifestyle business.  The problem with the lifestyle microfinancing stuff is that in reasonable investment lifespans, it&#39;s effectively a high-risk, low-reward prospect.  Putting $50k into a project now whose income might only hit $100k/year isn&#39;t a very good investment for a VC &#8212; on the other hand, it&#39;s a great investment for a person to make, doubly so if it enables them to quit their day job.</p>
<p>On the other hand, a VC-backed <a href="http://prosper.com">prosper.com</a> equivalent might be an interesting approach, particularly if it integrated with SourceForge or WorkingWithRails to programmatically grok &#8220;geek cred&#8221;&#8230;  Hrm&#8230;now I&#39;ve got a start-up idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
